Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb
  • Produktbild: Detention of Terrorism Suspects
  • Produktbild: Detention of Terrorism Suspects

Detention of Terrorism Suspects Political Discourse and Fragmented Practices

52,99 €

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

25.06.2020

Verlag

Bloomsbury Academic

Seitenzahl

312

Maße (L/B/H)

23,4/15,6/1,7 cm

Gewicht

440 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-3954-1

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

25.06.2020

Verlag

Bloomsbury Academic

Seitenzahl

312

Maße (L/B/H)

23,4/15,6/1,7 cm

Gewicht

440 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-3954-1

Herstelleradresse

Libri GmbH
Europaallee 1
36244 Bad Hersfeld
DE

Email: gpsr@libri.de

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)
  • Produktbild: Detention of Terrorism Suspects
  • Produktbild: Detention of Terrorism Suspects

  • Part I: Political Discourse
    1. Language Manufactures Truth: The Power of Labels
    I. The Beginning of the Conversation: Narratives Wield Great Power
    II. Whoever Prevails with Duelling Labels Wins the Day: 'Muslim Ban' or 'Extreme Vetting'?
    III. Motive and Omar Mateen: Immutable Characteristics Can Lead to a Label that Could Obscure True Motive and Undermine Systemic Responses
    IV. 'A Rose by Any Other Name .': Strategically Naming an International 'Terrorist' Group is Key to the Narrative
    V. Conclusion
    2. Breaking Down and Reconstructing Discourse Can Reveal New Realities
    I. Introduction: Fractured Narratives and Manufactured Confusion
    II. The Same Scenario, or the Same Words, with Different Meanings for Different People
    III. An Example: Kafka and Shifting the Kaleidoscope
    IV. 'Deconstructing' Anti-terrorism Detention Discourse
    V. Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Post-9/11 Discourse Using Argumentation Theory
    VI. Against this Backdrop, Post-9/11 Terrorism Detention Discourse Successfully Involved the Use of Effective Argumentation Tools
    VII. Conclusion
    3. Layers of Argumentation Tools and a Fractured Post-911 Narrative
    I. Introduction: How Threads of Perception Developed after 9/11
    II. Manufacturing Confusion: Euphemisms Played a Key Role in Influencing Public Perception
    III. Forward-Looking Threat-Based Discourse Perpetuated Already Rattled Nerves and Made Governmental Initiatives More Persuasive in the US
    IV. A Fractured Narrative Arose After 9/11, as Demonstrated by One Conversation between Representatives of Branches of the US Government
    V. Conclusion
    Part II: Fragmented Practices
    4. Hasty Inductive Generalisation: The Problem with the Claim that the 9/11 Attacks Exposed a Need for New Detention Paradigms
    I. Crisis Shifts in Long-Standing Detention Paradigms Occurred after the 9/11 Attacks
    II. The 'Unprecedented' Nature of the 9/11 Attacks
    III. The 9/11 Attacks Led to a Claim of Presumptive Inadequacy of National Criminal Justice Systems in Certain Cases
    IV. Certain Commonalities Emerged across Jurisdictions Regarding Extraordinary Detention Practices
    V. Special Mechanisms that Bypassed the Criminal Justice System Entirely
    VI. Other Examples of Changes: Torture and Targeted Killings
    VII. Conclusion
    5. False Premise: Non-citizens as the Terrorist 'Other'
    I. Many Post-9/11 Detention Changes Sprang from the False and Simplistic Idea that Terrorists were Non-citizens
    II. The Claimed Need to Protect 'Us' from 'the Other'
    III. The Othering before and after 9/11 was Directed between Organisations Like Al-Qaeda and those Claiming to Represent the West, Each Accelerating it against the Other
    IV. The Cycle of Othering that Led to the 9/11 Attacks Continued in Some of the National Responses to the Attacks
    V. The 'Other' Moves Forward as a Foundation for Extraordinary Terrorism Detention Practices
    VI. Conclusion: The False Premise of the Non-citizen Terrorist Other, which was Dominant in Post-9/11 Responses, Remains Foundational in Different Ways in Different Countries
    6. False Dichotomies in the Narrative: The 'Either/or' Dilemma
    I. Binary Language in the Post-9/11 Narrative and How it Precluded Nuance that Might Have Led to Better Responses
    II. Incommensurability in Binary-Based Discourse: The False Dichotomy of Balancing Liberty and Security Dominated after 9/11
    III. The Paradigm Fractures: The Misleading American Crime-or-War Detentions Debate
    IV. Terrorism Detentions: 'Everything Old is New Again'
    V. Conclusion: Deconstructing the Binaries
    Conclusion: Turning the Kaleidoscope
    I. The Conversation Continues: Can, or Should, the Fracturing in the Post-9/11 Terrorism Detention Narrative be Repaired?
    II. Changes to Political Discourse
    III. Fragmented Practices and Regrets
    IV. A Way Forward?